Ashley and Kyle were newlyweds in early 2022 and thrilled to be expecting their first child. But bleeding had plagued Ashley from the beginning of her pregnancy, and in July, at seven weeks, she began miscarrying.<\/p>\n
The couple\u2019s heartbreak came a few weeks after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned the federal right to abortion. In Wisconsin, their home state, an 1849 law had sprung back into effect, halting abortion care except when a pregnant woman faced death.<\/p>\n
Insurance coverage for abortion care in the U.S. is a hodgepodge. Patients often don\u2019t know when or if a procedure or abortion pills are covered, and the proliferation of abortion bans has exacerbated the confusion. Ashley said she got caught in that tangle of uncertainties.<\/p>\n
Ashley\u2019s life wasn\u2019t in danger during the miscarriage, but the state\u2019s abortion ban meant doctors in Wisconsin could not perform a D&E \u2014 dilation and evacuation \u2014 even during a miscarriage until the embryo died. She drove back and forth to the hospital, bleeding and taking sick time from work, until doctors could confirm that the pregnancy had ended. Only then did doctors remove the pregnancy tissue.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe first pregnancy was the first time I had realized that something like that could affect me,\u201d said Ashley, who asked to be identified by her middle name and her husband by his first name only. She works in a government agency alongside conservative co-workers and fears retribution for discussing her abortion care.<\/p>\n
A year later, the 1849 abortion ban still in place in Wisconsin, Ashley was pregnant again.<\/p>\n
\u201cEverything was perfect. I was starting to feel kicking and movement,\u201d she said. \u201cIt was the day I turned 20 weeks, which was a Monday. I went to work, and then I picked Kyle up from work, and I got up off the driver\u2019s seat and there was fluid on the seat.\u201d<\/p>\n
The amniotic sac had broken, a condition called previable PPROM. The couple drove straight to the obstetrics triage at UnityPoint Health-Meriter Hospital, billed as the largest birthing hospital in Wisconsin. The fetus was deemed too underdeveloped to survive, and the ruptured membranes posed a serious threat of infection.<\/p>\n
Obstetrician-gynecologists from across Wisconsin had decided that \u201cin cases of previable PPROM, every patient should be offered termination of pregnancy due to the significant risk of ascending infection and potential sepsis and death,\u201d said Eliza Bennett, the OB-GYN who treated Ashley.<\/p>\n
Ashley needed an abortion to save her life.<\/p>\n
The couple called their parents; Ashley\u2019s mom arrived at the hospital to console them. Under the 1849 Wisconsin abortion ban, Bennett, an associate clinical professor at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine, needed two other physicians to attest that Ashley was facing death.<\/p>\n
But even with an arsenal of medical documentation, Ashley\u2019s health insurer, the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program, did not cover the abortion procedure. Months later, Ashley logged in to her medical billing portal and was surprised to see that the insurer had paid for her three-night hospital stay but not the abortion.<\/p>\n
\u201cEvery time I called insurance about my bill, I was sobbing on the phone because it was so frustrating to have to explain the situation and why I think it should be covered,\u201d she said. \u201cIt\u2019s making me feel like it was my fault, and I should be ashamed of it,\u201d Ashley said.<\/p>\n
Eventually, Ashley talked to a woman in the hospital billing department who relayed what the insurance company had said.<\/p>\n
\u201cShe told me,\u201d Ashley said, \u201cquote, \u2018FEP Blue does not cover any abortions whatsoever. Period. Doesn\u2019t matter what it is. We don\u2019t cover abortions.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n
University of Wisconsin Health, which administers billing for UnityPoint Health-Meriter hospital, confirmed this exchange.<\/p>\n
The Federal Employees Health Benefits Program contracts with FEP Blue<\/a>, or the BlueCross BlueShield Federal Employee Program, to provide health plans to federal employees. In response to an interview request, FEP Blue emailed a statement saying it \u201cis required to comply with federal legislation which prohibits Federal Employees Health Benefits Plans from covering procedures, services, drugs, and supplies related to abortions except when the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or when the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest.\u201d<\/p>\n Those restrictions, known as the Hyde Amendment, have been passed each year since 1976 by Congress and prohibit federal funds from covering abortion services.<\/p>\n In Ashley\u2019s case, physicians had said her life was in danger, and her bill should have immediately been paid, said Alina Salganicoff, director of Women\u2019s Health Policy at KFF, a health information nonprofit that includes KFF Health News.<\/p>\n What tripped up Ashley\u2019s bill was the word \u201cabortion\u201d and a billing code that is insurance kryptonite, said Salganicoff.<\/p>\n \u201cRight now, we\u2019re in a situation where there is really heightened sensitivity about what is a life-threatening emergency, and when is it a life-threatening emergency,\u201d Salganicoff said. The same chilling effect that has spooked doctors and hospitals from providing legal abortion care, she said, may also be affecting insurance coverage.<\/p>\n In Wisconsin, Bennett said, lack of coverage for abortion care is widespread.<\/p>\n \u201cMany patients I take care of who have a pregnancy complication or, more commonly, a severe fetal anomaly, they don\u2019t have any coverage,\u201d Bennett said.<\/p>\n Recently, the bill for $1,700 disappeared from Ashley\u2019s online bill portal. The hospital confirmed that eight months later, after multiple appeals, the insurer paid the claim. When contacted again on Aug. 7, FEP Blue responded that it would \u201cnot comment on the specifics of the health care received by individual members.\u201d<\/p>\n Ashley said tangling with her insurance company and experiencing the impact of abortion restrictions on her health care, similar to other women around the country, has emboldened her.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m in this now with all these people,\u201d she said. \u201cI feel a lot more connected to them, in a way that I didn\u2019t as much before.\u201d<\/p>\n Ashley is pregnant again, and she and her husband hope that this time their insurance will cover whatever medical care her doctor says she needs.<\/p>\n KFF Health News<\/a> is a national newsroom that produces in-depth journalism about health issues and is one of the core operating programs at KFF\u2014an independent source of health policy research, polling, and journalism. Learn more about KFF<\/a>.<\/p>\nUSE OUR CONTENT<\/h3>\n